From: Costs of HIV testing services in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic literature review
Quality assessment of cost studies (N = 65) following the GHCC principles in % | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reported cost estimated by testing modality | Study purpose and population (P1) | Study perspective and types of costing approach used (P2-3) | Unit cost, time horizon, scope, the quantity of inputs, sampling, and data source strategy (P4-9) | Timing of data collection sources for price data (P10-11) | Annualisation or depreciation of capital cost and discounting (P12-13) | Shadow prices for goods and for the opportunity cost of time (P14) | Characterising heterogeneity (P15) | Characterising uncertainty (P16) | Communicated limitations, conflicts of interest (P17) |
Health facility (n = 76) | 100% | 80% | 73% | 87% | 87% | 22% | 26% | 17% | 91% |
Home-based (n = 32) | 100% | 85% | 77% | 88% | 77% | 8% | 8% | 31% | 100% |
Mobile services (n = 18) | 100% | 93% | 91% | 100% | 86% | 0% | 14% | 71% | 100% |
Self-testing (n = 25) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 33% | 33% | 100% | 100% |
Campaign style (n = 13) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 0% | 50% | 50% | 100% |
Stand-alone (n = 5) | 100% | 100% | 83% | 50% | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |